Importance of Political Theory

Importance of policy-making surmisePOLITICAL THEORY regimenal Theory is generating an endless debate about its comprehensive definition in that location are several views by theorists in pinch the nature of the discipline. in that location is ask to clarify the connoteing of key policy-making subjects much(prenominal)(prenominal) as dispatchdom, equivalence, justice etc. in a systematic manner. There is need to examine the arguments put forward by various policy-making think-tanks in the justification of these concepts. In examining arguments, at that place is also need to reflect upon our advanced(a) political fetchs and spot out trends and expectation for the future. governmental Theory is the conspiracy of two terms, politics and possible action. The word Politics, here stands for an acknowledgement of that which is to be theorized or understood, while Theory comes from a Greek word yelled theorema which means what emerges from theorizing. Theoros which mean s an intelligent observer, wizard who looks at what is going on, postulation suspenses about it and tries to understand it. (LSE 1/1/54. Autograph). canful Plamenatz described political theory as the systematic thinking about the purposes of government (Plamenatz, 1960 37) and I think this definition is just as apt today as it was then. political theory is, however, usually regarded as a distinctive approach path to the subject, even though, particularly in the USA, it is seen as a subfield of political learning involves the analytical study of ideas and doctrines that turn out been central to political supposition (Heywood, A. 2004). Political theory According to Farrell C. (2004), Political theory is thus a prescriptive discipline it is primarily concerned with how things ought to be as opposed to how things real are.Leftwitch (1994), points out that angiotensin-converting enzyme of the main contribution of political philosophy to our understanding of politics, is the po tential for developing consistency and clarity of thought and judgment and that this work of clarification is non about analytical or explanatory employment it is also about listening. According to Leftwitch politics is about conflict and its resolution, and closure conflicts of interest occurs in all societies at all levels.Philosophical questions such as the nature of truth, will, determinism, etc. play a crucial government agency in argumentation, but we prefer the term theory because it seems less daunting and abstract however we dont see any substantial difference between theory and philosophy (Hoffman, etal, 2009). Political theory is not a question of whether political animals follow theory, but a question of which theory or concept is supported when they present policies and undertake actions (Hoffman, etal, 2009). Theory and concept are tools used interchangeably for political analysis with which we think, criticize, surround, explicate and analyze to guide and info rm political action. To argue that something is true is not to cast out all doubt, if something is true this does not also mean that it is not also false. It simply means that on balance one proposition is truer or less false than the other. To argue otherwise is to attach that a phenomenon has to be one thing or another philosophers call this dualistic approach (Hoffman, etal, 2009).Theorists are not only important to politicians our notions of third estate sense and human nature are heavily infused with the views of thinkers we may never have heard of, for instance, Ben Barber tells us in his website that he was an inner advisor to President Bill Clinton between 1994 and 1999 because of his cogency to bridge the domain of a function of theory and practice. I can contest as to whether the political leaders, acts match to the right political concepts, but it is irrefutable that their dealings are committed to theory. In relationship to what Hoffman says, to point out that cou ntry is good is both true or false, because even the true democrats would acknowledge some shortcomings of democracy and even the aggressive critics would agree that it has some positive component.According to Friedman, this life-sustaining freedom is found only in free market capitalist economies, in which freedom in effect means the absence of government interference. According to Mills (1859), if all of mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one other soulfulness were of the contrary opinion, mankind would no to a greater extent be confirm in silencing that person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind. Thomas Hobbes for instance, described freedom as the silence of the laws. John Locke suggested that law does not restrict shore leave as much as defend or enlarge it. Therefore I can argue that while I agree that individuals should be forced to be free on the other hand unconstrained freedom or liberty could amount to the infringement of other throngs rights. For example, people should be forced or encouraged to express their freedom of expression or movement or demonstration while taking into consideration the rights of others without infringing their rights.The idea of equaliseity is perhaps the defining feature of modern political thought (Heywood, A. 2004). The most noticeable, and perhaps most imperative, manifestation of formal equality is the article of faith of legal equality, or equality before the law. In constructing his theory of justice as fairness, Rawls appeals to the idea of the social contract. Cohen, portrayed legal equality as market or bourgeois equality, and argued that it operates as little more than a facade, serving to disguise the reality of exploitation and economic inequality. In constructing his theory of justice as fairness, Rawls appeals to the idea of the social contract. A liberalist view, both person is blessed with reason or will, which hinges on individual rights, beliefs o f ground and self-interested. In true sense, however, equality does not mean the same give-and-take in as much as there can be no likeness of treatment as long as people differ in want, capacity and need etc.As Walzer argued, unalike principles of justice may therefore be appropriate in various spheres of life. Rawlss theory of the difference principle does permit inequality it does so only when such inequalities benefit everyone, especially the least advantaged. Dworkins principle, (2000) of equal concern requires us to compensate those who have handicaps and little native (or non-marketable) talents, there is a difference between someone who is less advantaged as a result of circumstances beyond their control (for example, being born with a severe handicap) and someone who is less advantaged as a result of their deliver choice (for example, choosing to live off welfare payments instead of working). For instance, when the government distributes fertilizer-subsidy or food items to the disadvantaged- I slightly agree with Rawls difference principle on one hand I do not agree on the other, especially the identification of the least advantaged. It is a little bit ingenious for someone to qualify as a genuine needy person because it could encourage laziness to those who pretend to be the poorest. It is better for anybody to sweat in order to get something rather than getting anything on silver tray. accounting is evidently important, as part of exploration into modern challenges. My view, political theory, is the ability to inquire into the political activity by using analytical tools such as concept, model and theory to dissect by believing the answers to the questions examined to have an important impact of what goes on in the real world. It is important for political academics to develop the critical skills necessary to explore unfermented experience and new knowledge through the analysis of political ideas and their relationship to political practice. T his experience in-turn informs the future. I can argue that academic political theory should catch out to enhance the quality of public political debate.BIBLIOGRAPHYFarrelly C. (2004). Introduction to Contemporary Political Theory.Heywood, A. (2004). Political Theory An Introduction, 4th edn. Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan.Hoffman J and Graham P. (2009). Introduction to Political Theory.Leftwitch A. (1994). What is Politics?