Investigation of the Probiotic Properties of Bacterial Strains from Two Probiotic Drinks and Their Survivability in Artificial Gastric Juice

Investigation of the probiotic properties of bacteriuml strains from ii probiotic drinks and their survivability in artificial gastric juice ABSTRACT Two probiotic drinks were investigated in vitro to turn out their ability to survive acrid conditions and their probiotic factors. Both the point of intersections Actimel and Yakult contain gee- supportive bacterium, just Actimel also has a Gram- disconfirming bacteria. The ability to survive was investigated by adding artificial gastric juice to the products and incubating at diametric times.Actimel and Yakult were both able to survive the gastric juice. Actimel produced more(prenominal) colonies than Yakult but they both lost the same percentage of viability. The longer the time incubated the more the loss of viability. Introduction In recent years wellness promoting operative foods has entered the global market as a result of increased preponderance of lifestyle related diseases (A. A. Aramide et al, 2009). People use func tional foods and diet to remark optimal health. Consumption of probiotics is unrivalled of the ways someone could reach and harbour their optimal health.A probiotic is living microorganisms, which upon ingestion in certain recites, exert health benefits beyond inherent basic nutrition (Todd R. Klaenhammer, 2000). According to the WHO/FAO report 2001 these probiotics tidy sum help prevent disorders associated with the gastroenteric tract, diarrhoea caused by certain infectious bacteria and viruses, inflammatory diseases, allergies and a lot more. Actimel and Yakult is a couple of the verbalise probiotic drinks. They claim to increase your bodys natural defences by combat off the bad bacteria. Actimel is a yogurt-type drink produced by a summate with called Danone.It has three strains of bacteria, cardinal traditional yoghurt cultures Lactobacillus bulgaricusandStreptococcus thermophiles and a ternary one called L. casei Imunitass (http//www. actimel. co. uk/About/-WhatIsA ctimel. aspx, Accessed Feb, 28, 2010). Lactobacillus is a genus of bacteria that aid in the variation of lactose to lactic acid hence increasing acidity in the stomach making it laborious for harmful bacteria to survive (http//en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Lactobacillus, Accessed Feb 28, 2010). Actimel contains 10 billion L. casei Imunitass bacteria per 100ml bottle.This bacterial strain works downst rail lines a wide range of pH and temperature hence able to survive the bitter conditions in the stomach. This ensures that the bacteria reach the gut alive and active. It helps by topping up the good bacteria in the stomach and making it hard for the germs to survive. The bacteria also aids in streng pastceing the gut argue so that wholly certain nutrients potty pass. In 2004 a countning game carried out to find the effect of Actimel on the immune response of subjects under academic examination stress showed that Actimel was able to control the number of lymphocytes and CD56 cells in subjects under academic examination stress.Other studies also show that the Actimel bacterial strains can be used in treating allergic rhinitis, prevention of diarrhoea and stimulate immune responses. On the other hand Yakult is milk based probiotic and contains tho one strain of bacteria LactobacilluscaseiShirota. It is produced and distributed by Yakult Honsha Co. Ltd. It contains 6. 5 billion L. casei Shirota per 65ml bottle. A variety of scientific studies have shown that Yakult has an effect on the human NK-cell activity, in screen outinal micro flora and immune parameters in humans.As a guideline a probiotic microorganisms should be resistant to gastric juices and be able to grow in the presence of bile under conditions in the intestines. The aim of this experiment is to sum of money the survivability of the strains in artificial gastric juice and to identify the bacterial strains tell to be in the product. MATERIALS AND METHODS Gram Stain Firstly the bacteria were raise up fixed according to the instruction in the lab manual. after passionateness fixing, crystal violet stain was added to the bacteria for 2 minutes, and so process in pee and Lugols iodine for 30 seconds.The bacteria were decolorised by adding 95% alcohol for 15 seconds followed by a water dust and counter stain with safranin for 1 minute. This was so washed with water and examined under high power (x100) using oil immersion. A flick of these strains each from Actimel and Yakult directly and pure culture was taken. desoxyribonucleic acid descent To leave off the DNA, 1 ml of culture was centrifuged for 5 minutes. The pellet was re suspend in 480 ? l of 50mM EDTA with 60 ? l of 10mg/ml lysozyme then incubated at 370C for 45 minutes, centrifuged for 2 minutes and re suspended in 600 ? of nuclei lysis solution and incubated at 800C for 5 minutes. After cooling down 3 ? l of RNAase was added and left-hand(a) to incubate at 370C for 30 minutes. The mixture was left to cool and 200 ? l of protein precipitation solution was added, left on ice for 5minutes followed by high speed (13000rpm) centrifuging for 5 minutes. The supernatant was then added to 600 ? l of isopropanol and mixed until DNA threads were formed and centrifuged for 15 minutes. The DNA pellet was washed with 200 ? l of 70% fermentation alcohol and centrifuged for 2 minutes. The ethanol was then removed and the DNA left to telephone circuit dry and then re suspended in 50 ? of unfertilised water. PCR of chromosomal DNA A 2 ? l of the DNA was added to 1 ? l of AmpF primer(GAGAGTTTGATYCTGGCTCAG), 1 ? l of AmpR (AAGGAGGTGATCCARCCGCA) primer, 2 ? l of dNTPs, 10 ? l of x10 PCR buffer, 83 ? l of water and 1 ? l of Taq polymerase was added. This mixture was laid in the Promega Wizard Chromosomal DNA preparation kit and track down according to the manufacturers guidelines. PCR refining The PCR reaction contents were added to a 1. 5 ml Eppendorf tube with 500 ? l of buffer PB1. This was centrifu ged at high speed in the spin column for 30 seconds.A 750 ? l of buffer PE was added to the spin column and centrifuged for 1 minute. The spin column was then placed in an Eppendorf tube and 50 ? l of water was added and centrifuged for a further 1 minute. A 15 ? l of this PCR product was added to 5 ? l of Gel loading buffer and was run at 50 V for 2 hours. 20 ? l of the PCR product was then direct to the John Innes sequencing service for sequencing. Media Preparation To media was prep atomic number 18d by adding 37g of Brain fancy Infusion (BHI) to 1 litre of distilled water and mixed using a magnetic stirrer.This was then added to a conical flask with 3g of agar and autoclaved at 1210C, 15 psi for 10 minutes. The media was then microwaved and poured onto petri mantrapes with Bunsen burner going, to sterilise the air around. Survival Studies For carrying out the survival studies, 5 ml of the product was added to 25 ml of artificial gastric juice and left to incubate at 370C for 30, 60 and 90 minutes. The product was taken from different bottles to ensure replicates. After incubation the mixture was then diluted to 10-5 for Yakult and 10-7 for Actimel. This was spread onto a petri dish and was left to incubate.The plates were then counted and the number of CFU/ ml was calculated. RESULTS Culturing bacteria Firstly the number of colony forming unit (cfu) per ml was worked out by culturing the bacteria from the probiotic products and figuring the number of colonies formed. This was then used to work out cfu/ window pane by using the volume they are produced in, which are 100 ml and 65 ml of Actimel and Yakult respectively. Table 1 Class data of cfu/ml and cfu/ back breaker of bacteria in the product Yakult(cfu/ml) Yakult(cfu/dose) Actimel(cfu/ml) Actimel(cfu/dose) 4. 21. x 109 2. x 1011 4. 36 x 109 4. 36 x 1011 4. 14 x 109 2. 86 x 1011 2. 6 x 108 2. 6 x 1010 9. 7 x 10 9 7. 8x 1010 2. 1 x 109 2. 1 x 1011 1 x 109 6. 3 x 109 7. 5 x 108 7. 5 x 1010 1. 6 x 109 6. 5 x 1010 5. 5. 2x 108 5. 5 x 1010 9 x 107 5. 8 x 109 1 x 1010 1 x 1012 7 x 107 4. 5 x 109 2. 5 x 109 2. 5 x 1011 4. 6 x 109 2. 99 x 1011 1. 21x 109 1. 21x 1011 1. 68 x 108 1. 09 x 1010 4. 3 x 1010 4. 3 x 1012 4. 02 x 108 2. 61 x 1010 1. 18 x 109 1. 18 x 1011 9. 1 x 107 5. 9 x 109 2. 89 x 108 2. 89 x 1010 1 x 108 6. 5 x 109 2. 7 x 109 2. 7 x 1011 x 108 3. 2 x 1010 3. 6 x 109 3. 6 x 1011 3. 4 x 107 2. 2. x109 2. 7 x 109 2. 7 x 1011 2. 39 x108 1. 5 x 1010 3. 78 x 109 3. 78 x 1011 9. 7 x 107 6. 3 x 109 5. 0 x 1010 5. 0 x 1012 1 x 108 6. 5 x 109 1. 4 x 109 1. 4 x 1011 1 x 108 6. 5 x 109 2. 6 x 109 2. 6 x 1011 To compare the mean differences between these two products an independent t test was carried out assuming equal variance. Table 2 Independent t-test of the shed light on data for cfu/dose on Actimel and Yakult Independent t-test mean Standard excursus SE Mean P Value cfu/dose Actimel 7. 9 x 1011 1. 45 x 1012 3. 41 x 1011 0. 056 Yakult 6. 29 x 1010 1. 04 x 1011 2. 46 x 1010 T he mean shows that Actimel contains 10 times more bacteria than Yakult on average. But only the mean is not significant to come to a conclusion as this could be because of sample variation. The P apprize from the t-test is 0. 056 which is greater than 0. 05 (P0. 05) hence the difference between the mean of the two products are not significantly different from zero at the 5% faith level. Gram Stain fig 1 shows the gram stain images from Actimel (i) and Yakult (ii).Figure 1 shows the gram stain images from Actimel (i) and Yakult (ii). Gram stained slides of both Actimel and Yakult were captured onto a figurer at x1000 magnification. From the images you can see that Yakult is stained all in one colour but the Actimel contains two different coloured stains. Survival studies To test the survivability of the bacteria they were incubated with artificial gastric juice for 30 60 and 90 minutes. The colonies were then counted Table 3 Viable counts of survival studies at different time and different replicates ActimelTime/min 1 2 3 Mean CFU/ml CFU/dose 0 329 69 1088 371. 5 3. 72 x 1010 3. 72 x 1012 30 321 39 880 322. 5 3. 23 x 1010 3. 23 x 1012 60 309 28 740 286. 8 2. 87 x 1010 2. 87 x 1012 90 204 24 642 238. 8 2. 39 x 1010 2. 39 x 1012 Yakult 1 2 3 Mean CFU/ml CFU/dose 0 312 135 53 125. 0 1. 25 x 108 8. 13 x 109 30 190 134 11 96. 3 9. 63 x 107 6. 26 x 109 60 159 130 11 92. 5 9. 25 x 107 6. 01 x 109 90 149 84 8 81. 5 8. 15 x 107 5. 3 x 109 The table shows that colonies on both Actimel and Yakult decrease over time in all the replicates.Both the products reduced to about 65% of its original count. A graph (Figure 2) was plotted with the CFU/dose against time on a log scale and it showed a analogue decline over time in both the products. DNA Extraction Figure 3 shows the Chromosomal DNA colloidal gel image. Figure 3 shows the Chromosomal DNA gel image. The DNA from the bacteria was extracted and gel dielectrolysis was carried out to ensure that a DNA was obtained fr om the extraction procedure. Lanes 3 and 4 have migrated towards the positive side showing that chromosomal DNA was obtained.PCR Purification After the DNA underwent the PCR process, the PCR product was purified and run on a gel electrophoresis to check if PCR product has been obtained. Figure 4 shows the image of PCR product run under electrophoresis. Figure 4 shows the image of PCR product run under electrophoresis. As the image shows in that respect is a PCR product obtained as there is a distinct band in lanes 2 and 3. DNA Sequencing The PCR product was then sent to the John Innes centre for sequencing and the following sequence was obtained.Actimel GGGTCGGGGCGGGTGCTATACATGCAGTCGAACGAGTTCTCGTTGATGATCGGTGCTTGCACCGAGATTCAACATGGAACGAGTGGCGGACGGGTGAGTAACACGTGGGTAACCTGCCCTTAAGTGGGGGATAACATTTGGAAACAGATGCTAATACCGCATAGATCCAAGAACCGCATGGTTCTTGGCTGAAAGATGGCGTAAGCTATCGCTTTTGGATGGACCCGCGGCGTATTAGCTAGTTGGTGAGGTAATGGCTCACCAAGGCGATGATACGTAGCCGAACTGAGAGGTTGATCGGCCACATTGGGACTGAGACACGGCCCAAACTCC TACGGGAGGCAGCAGTAGGGAATCTTCCACAATGGACGCAAGTCTGATGGAGCAACGCCGCGTGAGTGAAGAAGGCTTTCGGGTCGTAAAACTCTGTTGTTGGAGAAGAATGGTCGGCAGAGTAACTGTTGTCGGCGTGACGGTATCCAACCAGAAAGCCACGGCTAACTACGTGCCAGCAGCCGCGGTAATACGTAGGTGGCAAGCGTTATCCGGATTTATTGGGCGTAAAGCGAGCGCAGGCGGTTTTTTAAGTCTGATGTGAAAGCCCTCGGCTTAACCGAGGAAGCGCATCGGAAACTGGGAAACTTGAGTGCAGAAGAGGACAGTGGAACTCCATGTGTAGCGGTGAAATGCGTAGATATATGGAAGAACACCAGTGGCGAAGGCGGCTGTCTGGTCTGTAACTGACGCTGAGGCTCGAAAGCATGGGTAGCGAACAGGATTAGATACCCTGGTAGTCCATGCCGTAAACGATGAATGCTAGGTGTTGGAGGGTTTCCGCCCTTCAGTGCCGCAGCTAACGCATTAAGCATTCCGCCTGGGGAGTACGACCGCAAGGTTGAAACTCAAAGGAATTGACGGGGGCCCGCACAAGCGGTGGAGCATGTGGTTTAA Yakult TAGGAGTGGGCGCGTGCCTATACATGCAAGTCGAACGAGTTCTCGTTGATGATCGGTGCTTGCACCGAGATTCAACATGGAACGAGTGGCGGACGGGTGAGTAACACGTGGGTAACCTGCCCTTAAGTGGGGGATAACATTTGGAAACAGATGCTAATACCGCATAGATCCAAGAACCGCATGGTTCTTGGCTGAAAGATGGCGTAAGCTATCGCTTTTGGATGGACCCGCGGCGTATTAGCTAGTTGGTGAGGTAATGGCTCACCAAGGCGATGATACGTAGCCGAACTGAGAGGTTGATCGGCCACATTGGGACTGAGACACGGCCCAAACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAGTAGGGAATCTTCCACAATGG ACGCAAGTCTGATGGAGCAACGCCGCGTGAGTGAAGAAGGCTTTCGGGTCGTAAAACTCTGTTGTTGGAGAAGAATGGTCGGCAGAGTAACTGTTGTCGGCGTGACGGTATCCAACCAGAAAGCCACGGCTAACTACGTGCCAGCAGCCGCGGTAATACGTAGGTGGCAAGCGTTATCCGGATTTATTGGGCGTAAAGCGAGCGCAGGCGGTTTTTTAAGTCTGATGTGAAAGCCCTCGGCTTAACCGAGGAAGCGCATCGGAAACTGGGAAACTTGAGTGCAGAAGAGGACAGTGGAACTCCATGTGTAGCGGTGAAATGCGTAGATATATGGAAGAACACCAGTGGCGAAGGCGGCTGTCTGGTCTGTAACTGACGCTGAGGCTCGAAAGCATGGGTAGCGAACAGGATTAGATACCCTGGTAGTCCATGCCGTAAACGATGAATGCTAGGTGTTGGAGGGTTTCCGCCCTTCAGTGCCGCAGCTAACGCATTAAGCATTCCGCCTGGGGAGTACGACCGCAAGGTTGAAACTCAAAGGAATTGACGGGGCCCGCACAAGCGGTGGGA Figure 5 shows the graphical summary of strong hits in the database of Yakult (i) and Actimel (i). Figure 5 shows the graphical summary of strong hits in the database of Yakult (i) and Actimel (i).This sequence was then run by dint of the BLAST analysis to identify the probiotic isolate. Discussion A Probiotic must be able to survive the conditions of the stomach and pass through to the gut without significant loss. The b acteria found in the probiotics are culture on petri dishes to test the amount of colonies present in the product. As mentioned above Actimel contains 10 billion per 100 ml and Yakult contains 6. 5 billion per 65 ml. From the t-test there was no significant difference in the content of the two products (Table 1). This was due to the fact that they both contain 100 million bacteria per ml of product. From the gram stain images both Actimel and Yakult was stained with the same conditions.But Yakult had only one stain whereas Actimel had two different stains. This is due to the fact that there is more than one species of bacteria in Actimel. The colour of the staining represents two different types of bacteria gram-negative and gram-positive. All species of the lactobacillus genus are gram-positive. Gram-positive organisms harbor the stain when they are stained with crystal violet but gram negative organisms lose their purple/violet stain when washed with alcohol but when retain saf ranin stain. Therefore the Yakult contains only gram positive bacteria (L. casei Shirota) while Actimel contains both gram positive and gram negative bacterium (Figure 1). From the survival studies we can