Comparing Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill Essay example -- Karl Marx vs

Karl Marx was born and educated in Prussia, where he fell under the influence of Ludwig Feuerbach and other radical Hegelians. Although he share Hegels belief in dialectical structure and historical inevitability, Marx held that the foundations of reality mystify in the material base of economics rather than in the twinge thought of idealistic philosophical system. He earned a doctorate at Jena in 1841, writing on the materialism and atheism of Greek atomists, and so moved to Kln, where he founded and edited a radical newspaper, Rheinische Zeitung. Although he as well as attempted to earn a living as a journalist in Paris and Brussels, Marxs participation in unpopular policy-making movements made it difficult to support his growing family. He finally colonized in London in 1849, where he lived in poverty art object studying and developing his economic and political theories. Above all else, Marx believed that philosophy ought to be employed in practice to change the world. Al though it at commencement ceremony had little impact on the varied revolutionary movements of the mid-19th century Europe, the communistic pronunciamento was to become one of the most wide read and discussed documents of the twentieth century. Marx sought to differentiate his brand of socialism from others by insisting that it was scientifically based in the objective study of history, which he saw as being a continuous process of change and trans word formation. Just as feudalism had naturally evolved into mercantilism and then capitalism, so capitalism would ineluctably give way to its logical successor, socialism as the necessary offspring of class struggle. Marxs insistence that tough-minded realism should replace the utopian noble-mindedness of earlier socialists had profound consequences it enabled revolutionaries like Lenin to be put it into action, but it also tended to encourage its followers to accept ruthless means to justify what they believed were historically nec essary ends. Radical politics were being much more widely discussed than the small number of radicals justified but Marx uses this fact to his advantage by proclaiming that any ideology so feared must be important and worthy explaining clearly. In the notes, Marx is used as shorthand for both Marx and Engels. The Manifesto was earlier issued in several languages, including an English version. According to Mark, the modern age is a dangerous age, an age in which we might ... ...or the few is solely collectable to its non-existence in the hands of those nine-tenths. You reproach us, therefore, with intending to do away with a form of property, the necessary condition for whose existence is the non-existence of any property for the immense mass of society.In one word, you reproach us with intending to do away with your property. barely so that is just what we intend. From the moment when labour can no bimestrial be converted into capital, money, or rent, into a social power equa l to(p) of being monopolised, i.e., from the moment when individual property can no yearner be transformed into bourgeois property, into capital, from that moment, you say individuality vanishes. You must, therefore, confess that by individual you mean no other person than the bourgeois, than the middle-class proprietor of property. This person must, indeed, be swept out of the way, and made impossible.Works CitedMarx, K. and Engels, F. Manifesto of the Communist Party, in The Portable Karl Marx, edited by E. Kamenka, New York Penguin Books 1983. Mill, pot Stuart.On Liberty. Indianapolis Hackett, 1978.Mill, John Stuart.Utilitarianism.Indianapolis Hackett, 2001