Critique of Artificial Intelligence Essay

Journalist jakes Markoff wrote the article Computer Wins On Jeopardy Trivial, Its Not. He discusses how the super estimator Watson defeated the entirely time champion of Jeopardy Ken Jennings. The root, throughout the article, opposes that the super computing device Watson was a fair match against Ken Jennings. I dissent with Markoff for multiple reasons. This was in no itinerary a fair match because the computer had a remarkable ability to cause questions at super speeds. Also, the computer has chafe to all available questions and the ability to answer them. This was in no way a fair battle between the computer and Ken Jennings.The authors main idea of this article is mainly to say how the supercomputer was a fair match between the two. The computer has ways to answer questions that kind-hearted race have no way of doing. The computer heap answer questions indoors seconds and even milliseconds when the question is asked. It has a super speed ability to answer these que stions, which gives no time for the competitor to even have a scene to answer the questions given. So, when the competitor has no time to even have an flak to answer the question, there is no way to win. Watson is so smart that approximately e genuinely question that is asked, he answers correctly.Since I dont agree with Markoffs statement about Watson, I dont count his product line is valid. The reason I dont believe his assembly line and points are valid is that a computer that has remarkable and inhuman-like abilities is obviously qualifying to win in a competition of speed and knowledge. Ken Jennings had no chance against this computer. So, if a human has no chance against a machine, how can anyone call this a fair fight? Now, Markoff did define his terms all the way and specifically describe his reasons for why he thinks what he thinks, so I do give him credit for that. Still, I disagree with his argument.I disagree with most of Markoffs view about the competition betwe en the computer and Jennings. His main point of the fair competition is totally undebatable. Watson, on the otherwise hand, does not anticipate the light, but has a weighted scheme that allows it, when it is super confident, to hit the buzzer in as comminuted as 10 milliseconds, making it hard for humans to beat (Markoff 212). This statement made by Markoff proves that this was in no way possible for Jennings to beat the super computer. The computer can buzz in at amazing speeds as little as 10 milliseconds, which is way faster than any other human could possibly buzz in.Plus, the computer is programmed with so much information, that it would most possible be able to defeat Jennings, just because of the intelligence of this machine that the creators programmed into it. Overall, I do not believe that this piece published by John Markoff is in anyway valid. Markoff does however succeed in persuading people his ideas and describing his ideas and arguments truly specifically. H e does a good job with his argument and stating what he thinks. I do not agree with his argument though. My reaction to this piece is in reality astonished because I am not sure how anyone could think that a computer competing against a very intelligent human was fair at all.The weakness of this passage is probably how it can be hard for somebody to understand how a computer can manage to accomplish all this, but the strengths are good description and expression of the passage. Although he argues very well of his points, I in no way agree with his argument that the battle between Watson and Ken Jennings was fair.