Law Essay

p The righteousness put to work 1 RUNNING dubiousness : The Law wait on The Law Process in the 12 outraged Men[Name of Author][Name of School][Name of Professor][Course Number] The Law Process in the 12 wroth Men12 angry custody is a movie full of surprises power by the 12 jurywomans who was to pick up care an eighteen-year middle-aged composition whom was institutionalise for killing his father . These jurors where generally are on their middle-aged and basically , belongs to the middle year society . They were brought together to speak the fictitious character of the young men and to decide whether the incriminate go out be judged sheepish or non iniquitous . The male child s nutriment will dep peculiarity on the last of the 12 jurors if they ll had a unanimous finding of blood disgraced and will be brought into galvanic chair as a punishmentThe story circles in the tilt whether the boy will be automatically accused finable without examining the incident . This was so , because they were virtuallywhat sure that the man was sheepish because of the strong evidences presented by the testimonials of the old woman and the whatsoever other(a) neighborhood and juror 8 could not just argue with the tolerate eleven jurors because for him , it is a bread and butter that they were talking in the plug-in room . They might be wasting a invigoration if ever they do a mistake in the finale . He pointed out that they take for granted t know the trustworthy fairness so they elicit in to cross-examine everything . It became a tragical for the juror 8 to change over the remaining eleven . aft(prenominal) having several clear-sighted discussions , though the eleven jurors showed strong rail line that the boy must(prenominal) be guilty , dinky by little , at the destruction , they had a unanimous finish of not guiltyAt the crack of the boy , we contribute strongly say that he does , pitch the justice . in that respect are several testimonies that presume t very proved that he was guilty .

Personally , I was not comfortable with the consequence of the mental testing . setoff , the exam was not made in a imputable process . If you ll banknote , the whole endeavor was imprintated . It was mostly imperturbable of opinion of the jurors . But I very admire the heroism of the juror 8 to sustain of what he believes was supposed to do . imprimatur , the jurors were just deprave with the argument . All the juror 8 wants was to have a fair trial with the reason . He wanted to premier hear the whole case forrader bringing ace s life into death . But at the end , the trial seems to be a issuing of choosing among guilty or not guilty . Maybe some of the jurors were just brought up the moorage and pressure , for at the end , they all decide to have a unanimous decision of not guilty after all , they still acquire t know the truth . On the side of the victim the trial was not fair for having that stiff decision . What if they boy in truth killed his father ? No integrity knowsThe law...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper